Walk through any Korean residential neighborhood after 6 p.m. and you’ll notice something unusual: children everywhere, but not at home. They’re filing in and out of brightly lit storefronts with English names — Math Academy, Elite Science Institute, Global English Center. These are hagwons (학원), and understanding them is essential to understanding modern Korean society.
Part of our Evidence-Based Teaching Guide guide.
What Hagwons Actually Are
A hagwon is a private, for-profit educational academy. Koreans attend them for math, English, science, music, art, sports, coding — nearly any skill that can be taught. But the core of hagwon culture is academic: supplementary instruction designed to give students an edge in school exams, and ultimately in the CSAT (수능), the national university entrance exam.
According to Statistics Korea’s 2022 Private Education Survey, 78.3% of Korean elementary school students participated in private education (hagwons or individual tutoring). Among middle school students, the rate was 63.5%. Korean families spent a combined ₩26 trillion — roughly $20 billion USD — on private education in 2022 alone. This is not a fringe activity. It is a parallel school system.
The Western Misreading
When Western journalists and policymakers write about hagwons, the framing is almost always the same: Korean children are overworked, over-pressured, and suffering. This narrative is not entirely wrong, but it misses the complexity.
What gets missed: for many Korean families, particularly those outside the upper class, hagwons are understood as an equalizer. A child from a working-class family in Daegu can attend the same math hagwon as a child from a wealthy family in Gangnam — and if they work hard enough, compete for the same university seats. The pressure is real. So is the belief that the system is meritocratic, and that effort will be rewarded. That belief has its own cultural validity.
The Hagwon Teacher Economy
Top hagwon instructors in Korea are celebrities. “Star teachers” at major Daechi-dong hagwons in Seoul reportedly earn upwards of ₩1 billion ($750,000 USD) annually. They have fan followings. Students travel across cities to attend their classes. Their lecture videos sell online. This is a detail that Western accounts almost always omit: the hagwon ecosystem has created a market where exceptional teaching is rewarded at levels unimaginable in public school systems.
The Real Problems
The criticisms are legitimate. Korean government studies have repeatedly found that hagwon attendance correlates strongly with family income — the more families spend, the better outcomes students tend to achieve, which undermines the meritocratic ideal. A 2021 Korea Development Institute report found that the achievement gap between high and low-income students has widened over the past decade, in part because high-income families invest more heavily in private education.
There’s also the sleep cost. A Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs study found Korean adolescents average 7.1 hours of sleep — among the lowest in the OECD — with late hagwon schedules cited as a primary cause. Many hagwons legally operate until 10 p.m. (the government has attempted various curfew regulations with mixed success).
What’s Changing
Korean government policy has oscillated between trying to regulate hagwons and accepting their cultural entrenchment. Recent efforts have focused on expanding the quality of public school instruction, providing EBS (public broadcasting) lecture content freely to reduce the need for private tutoring, and piloting IB (International Baccalaureate) programs in select public schools.
Among younger Korean parents — particularly those who themselves experienced extreme hagwon schedules — there is a visible counter-movement toward reduced private education, more child-led play, and broader developmental priorities. Change is happening, just slowly.
What Non-Koreans Should Actually Take Away
Hagwon culture is not simply a cautionary tale about Asian over-pressure. It is also evidence that families, when they believe education determines life outcomes, will invest extraordinary resources and effort into it. The motivation is real. The infrastructure it created — thousands of high-quality instructors competing for students in an open market — produces teaching quality that public systems often can’t match.
The question isn’t whether Korea should eliminate hagwons. It’s whether the same intensity of belief in education can be channeled through structures that don’t require children to study until 10 p.m. six days a week. Korea is working on that. The answer isn’t obvious.
Data sourced from Statistics Korea (2022 Private Education Survey), Korea Development Institute (2021), and Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. Author writes as a working educator within the Korean public school system.
References
Part of our Complete Guide to Classroom Assessment guide.